
| FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE |
CONTACT: GEORGIA ECONOMOU |
| August
16,
2005—No. 73 |
(202)
785-8430 |
WASHINGTON D.C.—Gene Rossides,
President of AHI made the following statement on August 16, 2005:
Kissinger—An Accessory to Turkey’s War Crimes
August 14-16, 2005 marks the
31st anniversary of the second and massive wave of Turkey’s aggression
against Cyprus in the summer of 1974.
Turkey committed war crimes
by its illegal invasion of Cyprus on July 20, 1974 when it occupied
four percent of Cyprus’ territory with the illegal use of American-supplied
arms and equipment; and again in the second wave of its invasion
on August 14-16, 1974, when it breached a UN cease fire and UN sponsored
negotiations, three weeks after the legitimate government
of Cyprus had been restored, with a massive attack on the Greek Cypriots
and grabbed another 33 percent of Cyprus’ territory.
Then Secretary of State
Henry A. Kissinger by his actions at that time became an accessory
to Turkey’s war crimes.
First, I will set forth the
war crimes committed by Turkey’s armed forces.
The European Commission on
Human Rights issued a devastating report on July 10, 1976 on two
applications by the government of Cyprus regarding Turkey’s invasion
of Cyprus.
On January 23, 1977, the London
Sunday Times published excerpts from the report and stated: "It
amounts to a massive indictment of the Ankara government for the
murder, rape and looting by its army in Cyprus during and after the
Turkish invasion of summer 1974."
The European Convention on
Human Rights is, by the terms of its preamble, an extension of the
United Nations Universal Declaration of Human Rights of 1948. The
Commission’s report of July 10, 1976 found Turkey guilty of violating
the following articles of the European Convention on Human Rights:
- Article 2—by the killing of innocent civilians committed
on a substantial scale;
- Article 3—by the rape of women of all ages from 12-71;
- Article 3—by inhuman treatment of prisoners and persons detained;
- Article 5—by deprivation of liberty with regard to detainees
and missing persons—a continuing violation;
- Article 8—by displacement of persons creating more than 170,000
Greek Cypriot refugees, and by refusing to allow the refugees
to return to their homes—a continuing violation;
- Article 1 of the First Protocol to the Convention—by deprivation
of possessions, looting and robbery on an extensive scale.
Turkey’s use of American—supplied
arms and equipment in its invasion was in violation of the U.S. Foreign
Assistance Act of 1961. Turkey was in violation of section 505 (
d ) of the Act and section 3 (c) of the Foreign Military Sales Act
and became “immediately ineligible” for further military assistance
and sales.
What did Kissinger do that
made him an accessory to Turkey’s war crimes?
Kissinger, as Secretary of
State, was the primary official responsible for implementation of
section 505 (d) of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 and section
3 (c) of the Foreign Military Sales Act of the United States. Except
for the President, Kissinger had final authority regarding these
particular laws.
Kissinger continued to authorize
arms shipments to Turkey following Turkey’s invasion of Cyprus. He
failed to declare Turkey “immediately ineligible” for further assistance
and sales as required under the plain language of section 505 (d)
of the Foreign Assistance Act and section 3 (c) of the Foreign Military
Sales Act. That, in and of itself, made Kissinger an accessory
to Turkey’s war crimes. There is much more.
Kissinger’s clear and deliberate
violation of United States laws led Congress to pass the embargo
legislation against Turkey. Kissinger also violated his constitutional
oath of office to faithfully uphold and execute the laws of the United
States. Kissinger not only acted illegally, but he also failed to
deter the Greek junta from its planned coup against President Makarios.
Kissinger’s actions prior to
the invasion encouraged Turkey to invade Cyprus in July 1974, and
his actions thereafter further encouraged Turkey to renew its aggression
on August 14, 1974. The Los Angeles Times reported that Kissinger
knew in advance that the Turks planned to invade Cyprus in July 1974.
Nevertheless, Kissinger rejected an appeal from the United States
Ambassador to Greece, Henry Tasca, to use the United States Sixth
Fleet to stop the invasion.
A review of the sequence of
events leading up to the crisis is instructive. After the foiled
assassination attempt against Cypriot President Makarios and the
coup against his government, the British flew Makarios to London
to meet with Prime Minister Harold Wilson. The Turkish Cypriot leader,
Rauf Denktash, stated that they were “following the situation closely
with the Turkish authorities,” that it was a Greek Cypriot affair
and that the Turkish Cypriots should “not ….interfere in any way.”
Meanwhile, Nicos Sampson, an ultra-rightist and discredited former
member of the Greek Cypriot national liberation movement EOKA, was
installed as President of Cyprus. The coup and Sampson’s appointment
were condemned by Britain and other nations throughout the world, except
the United States.
While Britain was meeting with
Makarios and condemning Sampson and the coup, Kissinger gave Turkey
both time and the purported reason to invade Cyprus. Kissinger did
not criticize the coup and the assassination attempt against President
Makarios. In fact, Kissinger sought and obtained a postponement of
the United Nations Security Council meeting from Monday, July, 15,
1974, the day of the coup, to Friday, July 19, 1974. Kissinger instructed
the United States Ambassador in Nicosia to meet with the foreign
minister of the renegade Sampson government, and had “high American
officials” leak to the New York Times that the United
States was leaning towards Sampson. (See New York Times,
July 18, 1974, at A1 col.8)
Kissinger’s actions kept the
Sampson government afloat long enough for Turkey to prepare and invade
Cyprus, which she did on July 20, 1974.
Kissinger undermined the United
Nations-sponsored negotiations and cease-fire by approving a statement
issued by State Department spokesman Robert Anderson on August 13,
1974. The statement set forth the United States’ belief that the
Turkish Cypriots needed more security even though there was no evidence
of any threat to the Turkish Cypriot community. The statement was
followed the next day, August 14, 1974, by renewed Turkish aggression
when Turkish forces broke out of the four percent of Cyprus they
controlled and occupied another thirty-three percent of Cyprus. Kissinger
also ignored the United Nations Charter and UN resolutions on Cyprus.
If the United States had joined
Britain and the other members of the Security Council in immediate
condemnation of the coup and in supporting Makarios as the elected
leader of Cyprus, the Sampson government would have fallen before
the end of the week. This would have removed any possible excuse
for Turkey to invade Cyprus. Coincidentally, it would have finished
the Greek junta government as well. In any event, had the United
States actively opposed Sampson, Turkey’s aggression would have been
prevented.
In an editorial on September
14, 1974 (at A28, col.1), the New York Times put the responsibility
for the tragic events in Cyprus on Kissinger’s shoulders. The editorial
stated in part:
“A Library of Congress analysis
of pertinent legislation, inserted in the Congressional Record by
Representative John Brademas of Indiana, supports the contention
of Mr. Brademas and three colleagues in a letter to Mr. Kissinger
that the cut off in aid to Turkey ‘is not discretionary as a matter
of policy, but is mandatory under the terms of the Foreign Assistance
Act.…’
Senator Thomas F. Eagleton
of Missouri charges that President Ford is being deliberately kept
‘uninformed’ of the mandatory cutoff for Turkey ‘in order to protect
erroneous policy judgements made by the foreign affairs bureaucracy.’
But it has been not so much the State Department bureaucracy that
has so bungled American policy in the Cyprus crisis as Mr. Kissinger
himself.
The stalling on the aid cutoff,
in violation of the laws, is of a piece with Washington’s earlier
unwillingness to condemn Greece’s disintegrating junta for the coup
against the legal Government of Cyprus—a reluctance that encouraged
Turkey to intervene on the island. It is also consistent with Washington’s
refusal to condemn Turkey’s subsequent massive occupation of third
of Cyprus in flagrant breach of solemn cease-fire pledges.
Senator Eagleton, Representative
Brademas and their colleagues are to be applauded for persisting
in their demand for an end to Mr. Kissinger’s illegal appeasement
of Turkish aggression. " ###
For additional information, please contact Georgia Economou at (202)
785-8430 or georgia@ahiworld.org.
For general information regarding the activities of AHI, please view our
Web site at http://www.ahiworld.org.
Back to top |